Peer-Reviewed mRNA Shots Postmortem

[featured_image]
  • Version
  • Download 10
  • File Size 0.00 KB
  • File Count 1
  • Create Date February 7, 2024
  • Last Updated February 7, 2024

Peer-Reviewed mRNA Shots Postmortem

“Given the well-documented SAEs (serious adverse events) and unacceptable harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse and enforce a global moratorium on these modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.”

The authors also recommended an “immediate removal” of the COVID-19 vaccines from the childhood immunization schedule. They pointed out that children were at very low risk from the infection.

It is unethical and unconscionable to administer an experimental vaccine to a child who has a near-zero risk of dying from COVID-19 but a well-established 2.2 percent risk of permanent heart damage based on the best prospective data available.”

Attached Files

FileAction
20240201-2085-1dkv69eDownload

About the Editor

Patrick Wood
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.

Be the first to comment on "Peer-Reviewed mRNA Shots Postmortem"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*