The UN Cybercrime Convention Is A Blank Check For Surveillance Abuses

Source: EFF
Please Share This Story!

The only way to stop the United Nations from meddling in world affairs is to throw the entire organization into the Atlantic Ocean. Of course, that will never happen. The Electronic Freedom Foundation is tracking the UN Cybercrime Convention and notes that "it poses a global threat to cybersecurity and press freedom, and UN Member States must reject it." If ultimately passed, it will end free speech worldwide by criminalizing criticism of all United Nations narratives.

Technocracy News & Trends Premium Services are for Premium Access members only. Check it out!

Login Join Now

About the Editor

Patrick Wood
Patrick Wood is a leading and critical expert on Sustainable Development, Green Economy, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda and historic Technocracy. He is the author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation (2015) and co-author of Trilaterals Over Washington, Volumes I and II (1978-1980) with the late Antony C. Sutton.
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dark Exposure

If this so-called “cybercrime” convention is not rejected completely, it will only consolidate more power into the hands of tyrants, no matter the amendments. There’s no point in trying to amend anything to do with the UN. That could be compared with trying to dilute the most toxic poison to make it consumable. Every speck of the UN should have been rejected long ago, but like the aggressive, metastasized cancer it now is, will be with us unto death. Ambiguity and wiggle room are deliberately in legal language to allow abuses, which are necessary for abusers of power to exercise… Read more »

[…] The UN Cybercrime Convention Is A Blank Check For Surveillance Abuses […]